Show simple item record

Comparative transcriptomics in Syllidae (Annelida) indicates that posterior regeneration and regular growth are comparable, while anterior regeneration is a distinct process

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Rannyele P
dc.contributor.authorPonz-Segrelles, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorBleidorn, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorAguado, Maria T
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-17T04:15:08Z
dc.date.available2019-11-17T04:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16678
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Annelids exhibit remarkable postembryonic developmental abilities. Most annelids grow during their whole life by adding segments through the action of a segment addition zone (SAZ) located in front of the pygidium. In addition, they show an outstanding ability to regenerate their bodies. Experimental evidence and field observations show that many annelids are able to regenerate their posterior bodies, while anterior regeneration is often limited or absent. Syllidae, for instance, usually show high abilities of posterior regeneration, although anterior regeneration varies across species. Some syllids are able to partially restore the anterior end, while others regenerate all lost anterior body after bisection. Here, we used comparative transcriptomics to detect changes in the gene expression profiles during anterior regeneration, posterior regeneration and regular growth of two syllid species: Sphaerosyllis hystrix and Syllis gracilis; which exhibit limited and complete anterior regeneration, respectively. Results We detected a high number of genes with differential expression: 4771 genes in S. hystrix (limited anterior regeneration) and 1997 genes in S. gracilis (complete anterior regeneration). For both species, the comparative transcriptomic analysis showed that gene expression during posterior regeneration and regular growth was very similar, whereas anterior regeneration was characterized by up-regulation of several genes. Among the up-regulated genes, we identified putative homologs of regeneration-related genes associated to cellular proliferation, nervous system development, establishment of body axis, and stem-cellness; such as rup and JNK (in S. hystrix); and glutamine synthetase, elav, slit, Hox genes, β-catenin and PL10 (in S. gracilis). Conclusions Posterior regeneration and regular growth show no significant differences in gene expression in the herein investigated syllids. However, anterior regeneration is associated with a clear change in terms of gene expression in both species. Our comparative transcriptomic analysis was able to detect differential expression of some regeneration-related genes, suggesting that syllids share some features of the regenerative mechanisms already known for other annelids and invertebrates.
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen-Access-Publikationsfonds 2019
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMC Genomics. 2019 Nov 14;20(1):855
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.titleComparative transcriptomics in Syllidae (Annelida) indicates that posterior regeneration and regular growth are comparable, while anterior regeneration is a distinct process
dc.typejournalArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12864-019-6223-y
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.date.updated2019-11-17T04:15:08Z
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume20
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1
dc.type.subtypejournalArticle
dc.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber855
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalBMC Genomics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record